img 07792132921
img 37 Hatton Road Cheshunt EN8 9QG
contax 645 vs pentax 645
4th Dec


contax 645 vs pentax 645

The 6x7 negatives are just glorious. The Pentax 67 is a camera with plenty of replacement parts and the price has yet to shoot as high as the Contax 645. The Pentax … I just think the Contax looks beautiful. Auto focus. Pentax 645NII â�� $2,125. I'm aware of the modern CMOS advantages in terms of lower noise at higher than base ISO's, increased dynamic range, and better performance in … Having seen the pop of the subject and super-pleasant, non-boring-yet-undistracting bokeh, I figured I'd give it a try. 1. etanche aux intempéries (résistant aux éclaboussures) Pentax 645D. Related: mamiya 645 hasselblad pentax 645 pentax 67 contax 645 lens pentax 645n mamiya rz67 mamiya 7 hasselblad 500cm mamiya rb67 contax 645 80mm f2 contax g2. Pentax 67II. Pentax 645Z. At this point I will reiterate that this article is not to bash the Contax 645--I love my Contax 645 setup. With film, you shoot it and there's no object that you can sell/use to recover your initial investment. Several other options exists, although each has it's own drawbacks. ), Pentax 67 is cheaper up front, but you'll pay for only having 10 frames, There are some great digital alternatives to either replace or pair with your medium format option(s), There's a lot more to this article and you may be cheating yourself if you only read this part, Bridesmaids lined up during ceremony. PENTAX 645 SMC 75mm 2.8 LS v's Non LS. Pentax has been making 645 cameras since 1984, or for over 25 years.. I think this is a fantastic option. While they don’t have fancy Eye autofocus or anything like that, they both have pretty good autofocus systems, very fast motor drives, and all the basic bells and whistles you could get on a film camera in the early 2000s. It's not bad at all; it just doesn't have "the look" for me like some of the alternate options. As technology progesses, these rather expensive systems/their technology should become more accessible. The Contax 645 was my first medium format camera and my reason to move into the world of film photography. C’est simple : Cherchez, Cliquez, Trouvez ! Pentax 67 w/  Cinelux or ISCO Ultra MC Lenses (see this guide to Cineluxes to understand the differences between Schneider and ISCO), As good or better bokeh and “pop/3d effect” as the Zeiss 80mm f/2, Very smooth “creamy” rendering, as good or better than Zeiss 80mm f/2, Manual focus (if that’s a deal-breaker for you), Can be a bit of a costly investment (sometimes around the price of a Zeiss 80mm f/2), No native aperture, though you can purchase a Schneider Cinelux with an aperture installed, Image of bride and groom embracing with bouquet taken using Pentax 67 and Schneider Cinelux Ultra MC 120mm f/2, Similar look to 80mm f/2, including very smooth/”creamy” skintones, Often reported as better autofocus than Contax, If bought used, one can spend about the same or less than current Contax 645 market prices, 100mm is arguably a better portrait focal length than the Zeiss 80mm on 645, I personally have trouble accidentally hitting the shutter button. 117 vs 27; Compatible avec le WiFi? Of course Pentax does offer leaf shutter lenses for the 645. The 645N has a much brighter viewfinder than my Pentax … But again, you see a little bit more warmth with the Pentax through the leaves, and more fall-off and contrast from the Contax with the Zeiss lens. It replaced the manual-focus Pentax 645, and was later replaced by the very similar 645N II. 7 years. Does anyone know if this exists? And that’s understandable – the first has pedigree, the … In 2010 Pentax introduced a digital version of the 645, called the 645D. 56. points. Regardless of the semantics, the pop-effect and what all actually creates it is hard to describe, though undeniable. Originally the Pentax 220 which was created in 1965 … iShoot QS-85 QR pour Mamiya 645, Hasselblad 503, Pentax, Contax 645 645: Photo & Caméscopes Image of bride and groom taken during wedding using Contax 645 and Zeiss 80mm f/2 on Fuji 400h, developed by State Film Lab. Also, be sure to see our full Fujifilm GFX 50S review as well as our GFX 100 review for more thoughts on this camera system! I actually find my Pentax 645 to be a more annoying of a shutter sound and advance. Image taken with Fuji GFX 50S and Schneider Cinelux 105mm f/2, Fuji GFX 50S with Schneider Cinelux Ultra from The Boutique Lens, Sony A7Riii w/ Zeiss 80mm f/2 + Speedbooster, Can use Kipon Baveyes C645 Speedbooster adapter effectively, Has a look very close to Contax 645/80mm when using Speedbooster, Speedbooster may effect image quality to some degree; minor distortion may occur in certain parts of the image including some effect to the bokeh which might be described as some loss to "buttery-smoothness" and added "jittery-ness". They seem to be the trending and coveted camera for wedding shooters at the moment, commanding upwards of $3000.00, but there is … Manual focus only. Yes, it's heavy, and no it doesn't have autofocus, but that's ok. If you need a quick refresher, the Contax 645 is a 6×4.5cm medium format, autofocus film camera introduced by Kyocera under the Contax brand on February 20th, 1999 in Japan. The images have a very pretty look. Film loading: After much practice, I feel pretty confident with loading my Pentax 67 quickly. So, we’ve put together our list of our top tips that we’ve personally experienced that help make your wedding day run smoothly! Add Comment Back to Forum « ‹ 1 › » scottmorgan Member. Hey everyone! Image taken using Pentax 67 and Pentax SMC 105mm f/2.4. I shoot trains, … I like to think that 10 frames lend itself to "quality over quantity" mentality. To check out pricing and more info on this adapter to mount V series lenses to H series bodies, check it out on Amazon and Ebay, Image of flower girls taken with Pentax 645nii using a 75mm FA f/2.8 lens, Not quite the level of plasticity/microcontrast we see in the Zeiss 80mm f2, No interchangeable film backs/inserts must be changed after roll is finished. Has the “how much should I spend on my wedding photography?” question arisen? Visitez eBay pour une grande sélection de contax 645. No autofocus and all the other weaknesses of a Pentax 67 kit. I think this combo can tend to look a little "sterile". 6.66 mm 55.00 mm Sensor size comparison. Phase One XF or H2 Body w/ IQ1 100mp Digital Back w/ Contax 80mm f/2, Cinelux, etc. Although an amazing kit, the Contax 645/ Zeiss 80mm combo is in a potentially dangerous position as the bodies known for their skittishness become more rare and more hoarded. I have yet to see any images that convince of this. Thank you! Having a solid timeline and being prepared are key approaches to helping make that goal a reality. The largest concerns with using the Pentax 67 at weddings are: Weight: I do struggle with the weight of carrying my Pentax 67 all day. The Contax 645 is a modular system with removable backs, prisms, and lenses. Other cons can include the following: expensive, cannot change aperture from f/2, no autofocus, wait time/availability. In my mind, this is a huge reason why I want to continue becoming super familiar with the Pentax 67. Both cameras would hunt, but the Pentax could actually find a subject and lock on somewhere with pretty much every frame. It is also interesting bokeh, but not too choppy or distracting. Also, they may have a very limited focal range, say up to 15 meters or less. Contax 645 … Pentax 645D vs Pentax 645Z: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. How Richard Nixon ‘Stole’ This Photo and Twisted It Into a Campaign Slogan, Ilford is Creating a Set of Super Helpful ‘Darkroom Guides’ on YouTube, Full Moon Photo Looks Like Mysterious Giant Eye Through Rock Arch in Utah, Easy Eye-Catching Macro Photo Ideas You Can Make At Home, 25 People’s Choice Finalists from the 2020 Wildlife Photographer of the Year Contest, Sony Overtakes Canon in October Camera Sales Numbers Out of Japan, Lunar Probe Captures 119 Megapixel Pano Photo of the Moon’s Surface, 70 Inspirational Quotes for Photographers, Faking an Oceanside Photo Shoot with a Swimming Pool and a Toy SUV, 5 Facts About Vision that Will Change the Way You Take Pictures, Why Canon is Winning Full-Frame Mirrorless, Sony Unveils Visual Story, A New Cloud Storage iOS App for Pro Photogs, Sigma’s Magnetic Metal Lens Caps Are Proudly Over-Engineered, If Your iPhone Has a Green Dot in iOS 14, Your Camera May Be Spying On You, Sigma Launches Three New Primes as Part of the I Series of Compact Lenses, Dr. Seuss Goes After Photographer Over Grinch-Themed Photo Shoot, This Artist Cleverly Fills Photo Cutouts with Real-World Scenes, Photographing Portraits of Brewers and Developing the Film in Their Beer, This Guy Watercooled His Canon R5 and Unlocked Unlimited 8K, 20 Composition Techniques That Will Improve Your Photos, Android Smartphones Can Now Use Profoto Pro Flashes. I sold mine because it doesn't work with weird setup, but it's a terrific lens. The body when fitted with AE prism and film back feels very solid and is as beautiful to look at, as it is to shoot. 51.40 . I can clearly see my focus and am becoming better and better at snapping the subject into focus. In true Pentax fashion, the 645 is almost perennially forgotten and under-appreciated. Another thing worth mentioning is that the lens on the Pentax only goes down to f/2.8, whereas the lens on the Contax goes down to a f/2. The most popular alternative to the Pentax 645 is the Contax 645. With that said, my wife is shooting the Contax 645 with 80mm f/2. Lenses are difficult to find. Since you're investing in valuable goods, you can sell your gear at some point and still recover cost. My experience with Pentax 645 bodies has been mixed. If you own a 645 camera and would like to get some lenses for it, eBay has a range of options from which you can choose. When we got engaged, we anticipated a lot of planning for the wedding—plus we had to begin planning to move in together once we were married! Are there differences you see in the output of the 645D vs. other modern Sony CMOS sensor based cams such as the D800, that could be attributed to some quality of the CCD sensor in the Pentax? The lens was full of fungus and the body's autofocus wasn't working at all. The Pentax 67 has a look to it as unique as the Contax combo. I mean is it the same glass etc. Using aperture ring of the lens or command dial on the body to control the aperture. You can even add a nice (but expensive) accessory battery holder/vertical grip (the MP-1). They're different looks with different strengths, and I honestly couldn't pick one over the other universally in terms of image quality. To check out this body and average cost to getting into the system, view the Phase One XF here on Ebay. The subject "pops", and it's not merely just because of the bokeh, or shallow depth of field. (I personally don't mind this "shortcoming"). Other problems such as film flatness issues and/or the mirror not resting all the way down can also result in focusing issues. So what's all the hype with the Contax 645? Have heard images referred to as a bit "crunchy" compared to film. I would guess you could make these things match pretty close if you want to, but right out of the gate, with no additional work, the Contax has a richer, heavier color, heavier blacks, and heavier contrast than the Pentax. To check on prices and availability ofH2 bodies, prisms, click here. Once I learned that you could apply pressure to the locking metal knob on the bottom while rolling the roll backward, it's become a much easier process. When it comes to the Contax 645s fancy in the eye of photographers, we're really talking about image quality, which comes from the glass-- the Zeiss 80mm f/2. Let's recap the pros and cons of the Contax 645 combo compared to other medium format options: Ergonomics are pretty good/feels good in the hand, Various reports on autofocus being good/decent/bad, Lack of reliability/finicky (randomly not working in certain conditions, lack of parts/serviceability, longevity, price, lack of supply/availability), Also, in terms of practicality, this system is rumored to be finished in 10-15 years according to my conversation with one of the few people in the world that performs repairs on Contax 645. Design Optique Performances vidéo Audio Batterie Fonctionnalités. I'm aware that film loading can be much quicker with the interchangeable backs of the Contax, but it's not super convenient to carry around a lot of preloaded backs. It is extremely user-friendly, like most 645 format- but unlike many larger medium format cameras. Matériel; Pentax fait évoluer son étonnant reflex moyen-format 645. That's assuming that the hit/keep rate on the 645 is comparable to the 67 and that we are indeed shooting equal amounts of film. One of the most important factors when selecting a wedding photographer is undoubtedly the right amount of experience. Best Match. The Contax 645 system is a completely different horse, though. – Poland . It's extremely pleasant in terms of buttery smoothness but isn't boring or flat as some lenses. Loudness of the shutter: I will admit--I've gotten some looks from guests during the wedding ceremony when this thing slaps. To check on prices and availability of thePentax 645, click here to view it on Ebay. There are lots of reasons why this is the case. Great lens quality, shallow depth of field, etc. The Contax … 01-18-2011, 07:40 AM #2: VoltMan. The FA version is a new optical formulation, and in my view not as good. The body itself feels more expensive. We’re often asked by brides, “What all should I bring to be included in my flat-lay?” So, here’s our official guide on creating meaningful flat-lays! There also exists several other lenses I'm working to test. Up front, let's get this out: GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome) is real; amazing images have been created with less than amazing cameras. Best Pad Prompter Teleprompters Under $500 in 2020, SEO for Wedding Photographers in 2020: How to Book More Clients Using SEO, Honeybook vs Dubsado vs 17hats: Best CRM for Wedding Photographers in 2020, Best Film Emulation Presets: Matching Digital to Film, Best Laptop For Editing Wedding Photos: Dell XPS 15 Review, How to Adapt the Pentax 67 105mm f/2.4 to Pentax 645, Tips for Moving In Together for the First Time. Both are DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras that are based on a full frame (N Digital) and a medium format (645D) sensor. Sort: Best Match. But strangely, I have spoken to quite a few that have reported the same issues. Pentax 645Z Medium Format DSLR Camera Plus Pentax-D FA 645 55mm f/2.8 AL[IF] SDM AW Lens Kit: $6,479.65: Accéder à l'offre: Design. It seems like a daunting concept and a burden insurmountable. What other camera bodies would you include? This camera eventually led to a larger brand name that produces several products now. They like the idea of shooting at f/2, especially with the medium format. Don't put down Mamiya optics. As a wedding photographer, I am sometimes met with amazement by others who would never consider the Pentax 67 for wedding photography. It was an ambitious foray in the professional portrait and wedding world where medium format was king (at the time) and competed against the likes of the Pentax 645N and Mamiya 645 AF. My experience with Pentax 645 bodies has been mixed. Image of groom smiling taking using Pentax 67 with Schneider Cinelux Ultra MC 120mm f/2. Since "the look" of the medium format perspective is unique and interesting, here are a few options that provide some of that "look". The properties that stand out so well with this lens are: Amazingly smooth, yet delightfully pronounced bokeh, Smooth transition from out of focus to in focus areas. Speaking from a business perspective, the cost difference between 10 frames and 16 frames is pretty astonishing as we've shown above. Mamiya 645 vs Contax 645 When I look at the Mamiya M645 Super and more so the Mamiya 645 Pro range they are so similar to the Contax 645 with the DSLR like grip option, film back and film inserts, prism viewfinder and the Zeiss 80mm f2 lens on the Contax 645 … Leica M240 vs Leica CL – Polish Models . In this section, We are going to illustrate Pentax 645D and Pentax 645Z side-by-side … Pentax has been making 645 cameras since 1984, or for over 25 years.. Good lens, but doesn’t have the same “pop” as the Zeiss 80mm", Good lens, but seems a litte more sterile to me, Good lens, but doesn’t have as much “pop” or character as the Zeiss 80mm. Image of couple photographed using Contax 645 and Zeiss 80mm f/2, Comparable or perhaps slightly shallower depth of field compared to 80mm f/2 on Contax 645, 6x7 negatives provide for a very interesting perspective, High resolution, sharp, very pleasant bokeh, Excellent "pop" that rivals the Zeiss 80mm f/2, I personally don’t think that the 105mm 2.4 possess the level of "creaminess” that is seen in photos taken with the Zeiss 80mm or the Cinelux lenses. Words like "plasticity, "roundness" micro-contrast, or "the 3D effect" have all been given various definitions, often with one person disagreeing with another on which word means what. Also, using all that money saved on not buying a Contax 645 kit means you can afford to hire an assistant to load your Pentax 67 for you! What Should I Include In My Flat-Lay Photos? Contax U4R vs. Pentax 645Z Comparison. Image taken with Schneider Cinelux Ultra MC 120mm f/2. Pentax 645 - Achetez une variété de produits à prix abordables sur eBay. I just don't think it's smart to rely on it always being there for me. To check out Pentax 67 prices and average cost to getting into the system, view Pentax 67s on Ebay by clicking here. For those who don't want the TL:DR version/that want the answers quick: Contax 645 bodies are great, but they can be very skiddish (Read more below and/or in my Contax 645 Review), I like Contax 645 and I like the Pentax 67 with 105mm, and highly favor the Pentax 67 w/ Cinelux lenses (p.s. I think this makes for a great all-around portrait/details combo. I've heard the focusing screen is darker on the earlier Mamiya 645s. I’ve seen them as low as $650 or $700 for the body. 725g plus léger? I considered many brands and models: Pentax and Mamiya in particular, as well as Contax 645. February 6, 2018 I think the button is more exposed than the shutter button on the Contax, so when carrying it during a wedding day, it’s common to bump it and expose a few random frames, f/2.2 not quite as low light capable as the Zeiss 80mm f/2, The 100mm 2.2 can sometimes be difficult to find, Bokeh is very similar to the Zeiss 80mm f/2, PERHAPS a little less pronounced, Image of bride taken with the Hasselblad H2 and HC 100mm f/2.2 lens on Fuji 400H, Image of bride and bridesmaids holding bouquets during wedding taken with Hasselblad H2 and 100mm 2.2 lens, Image taken with Hasselblad H2 100mm f/2.2. Yes, even with the autofocus being unusable in low light, I would just manual focus the Contax. I also love the way it resolves the lines around the trees. The Pentax seems a lot more usable in lower light and the viewfinder is brighter in the Pentax. Une alternative intéressante aux Hasselblad et PhaseOne concurrents. A lot of people think that that’s kind of a big deal. To check on the appropriate film backs/inserts for H2 cameras,view the Hasselblad HM 16-32 film backs on Ebay. Of course, you are scanning these things after processing the film, so whoever is making the decisions on these scans can push them around a lot. I am thinking about getting a medium format camera . To be transparent, all links are paid advertising, as a portion of any purchase made while using these links is credited to us. Now, this may have been from a defective insert. The Contax is way more expensive at around $3,000, whereas you can get the Pentax for around $1,000. Economisez avec notre option de livraison gratuite. Source(s): Now, if we're using a 645, that's about 281 rolls per year for a total of $6,046, a savings of over $3,600. Achetez en toute confiance et sécurité sur eBay! What do you want to spend it on? However, I find it a joy to use at weddings. Can use Speedbooster to achieve more shallow depth of field, Not a true 645 (43.8 x 32.9mm sensor vs 56 x 42mm), Many lenses can appear sterile as they do on any other camera, If Speedbooster is used, distortion/images quality reduction may occur, To check out this body and average cost to getting into the system, view the Fuji GFX 50S on Ebay and Amazon. Cinelux lenses 105mm and up can be modded pretty effectively, from reports that I've heard. The largest sensor size at the time of this writing for digital 645 is 53.9 x 40.4mm for a "CCD" sensor and 53.4 x 40.1mm for a "CMOS" sensor. So you know that reading this article is worth it, we'll cover: Future outlook on the Contax 645 system for professional work, What's so great about the Contax 645 Zeiss 80mm f/2 combo, Other film alternatives to the Contax 645, Digital alternatives to Contax 645/Medium format film cameras, A "Contax 645 vs Pentax 67" discussion from a wedding photographer's perspective, I've also included some links to other great articles on the topic that I think provide a good/slightly different perspective and information, Image taken with Contax 645 using Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2 lens, Professional photographers looking to make the wisest, long-term decision in investing in their film camera kit workhorse, Professional photographers (especially wedding photographers) considering the purchase of a Contax 645, Photographers looking for alternatives to what the Contax 645 kit has to offer, Photographers looking for further discussion on the characteristics of lenses such as the Zeiss 80mm f/2, Pentax 105mm, and others, Those looking to find the best camera/lens combo in medium format film. Maimya 645: I'm considering the Super, Pro and Pro TL models.

Treacle Tart With Coconut, Background Flower Images For Photoshop, Canna Burst Gummies Dosage, Casio Sa-46 Power Supply, Red Label Price In Kolkata, Mould Bugs On Walls,

Share This :